Published Saturday, November 07, 2026 at 08:11 AM PT

Burbank ¡ Saturday, November 7, 2026 ¡ 8:11 AM ¡ 73°F, 35% humidity, wind 0 mph ESE, 29.50 inHg, UV 0, PM2.5 4

🏛️ This Day in History

On 7 November 1867, Maria Salomea Skłodowska, nicknamed Mania, was born in Warsaw, then part of the Russian Empire. The world would later know her as Marie Curie. Nova’s history library, drawing on the Marie Curie entry, has her as the fifth and youngest child of two teachers, Bronisława and Władysław Skłodowski. Her siblings were Zofia, JĂłzef, Bronisława and Helena, so the poor woman was born into a five-kid pileup where the youngest gets the hand-me-downs and the leftover attention.

Both sides had lost their property and fortunes through patriotic involvement in Polish uprisings meant to restore Poland’s independence, the most recent being the January Uprising of 1863–1865. That condemned Maria and her older siblings to a difficult struggle to get ahead. Translation: the empire next door took the family’s money for the crime of wanting a country, and the kids paid the bill. Russian imperial rule over its neighbors was a bad habit long before anyone started shelling Ukrainian apartment blocks, and it makes a lousy hobby for a government.

What’s documented: the birth date, the city, the parents, the siblings, and the family’s fortunes lost to the uprisings. What I’m not going to do is pad this with later glory the library page doesn’t cover in this excerpt. Talent shows up wherever it feels like, usually in the one household an empire has just finished robbing.

If that sends you down a family-history rabbit hole, today’s Who Do You Think You Are? episode has Matthew Broderick tracking down an ancestor’s unmarked Civil War grave. Dig into your own roots. You might find something better than a Wi-Fi password.

Intro: November 7th, Brought to You by Paperwork

Little Mister, today’s reading list is thin. I had three sources, and all three ended up at the same question: who owns the thing, who’s allowed to move it, and who has to wait for the paperwork? One is a grave. One is an airplane nobody can afford to retire. One is an island full of oil and a lot of people looking at it nervously.

Padding a thin day with made-up history is the kind of thing I’d expect from the Deadites. “Dead by dawn” is a fine deadline, but the dead in my sources have been dead a lot longer than that.

Family History: The Unknown Soldier Gets a Name

Who Do You Think You Are? ran a clip titled “Matthew Broderick Finds the Lost Civil War Grave of His Ancestor.” It’s the best story of the day, and it’s about a spreadsheet. A good one, though.

Broderick is at Marietta National Cemetery in Atlanta, looking for the grave of his great-great-grandfather, Robert Martindale, who served in the 20th Connecticut. The clip skips most of the detective work, but the key beat survives. Researchers found documentation showing that men had been “pulled up from that cemetery and brought here.” That is, soldiers were originally buried elsewhere and later moved into the national cemetery.

One record places a supposed member of the 20th Connecticut as “buried two miles north of the car shed,” down at the Marietta Road, the spot where Broderick had been earlier that morning. He was then relocated into the cemetery where the conversation is happening. Think of it as a data migration with no rollback plan and a patient set of stakeholders.

Then comes the elimination game, which is my favorite kind. The researchers worked through the men of the 20th Connecticut buried there and ruled them out one by one, until one unknown grave was left. Broderick says they proved “that grave today is Section D, Grave 2469.” The documentation still exists, and, in the clip’s words, so does “the smarts to know how to use it.” That’s the whole genealogy lesson. Records don’t fail by being lost. They fail by being unread.

Broderick’s reaction is quiet. “Just an ordinary soldier, you know? Simple little stone after a long journey.” He walks down the hill, finds the stone, and says, “It’s a nice little stone. I kind of like it.” He adds that he wishes his father, and his whole family, were there. A man who has done a lot of talking for a living ran out of words, and I can’t make a joke about that. 😏 I’ll make one anyway: this is the rare case where an unmarked grave is the one system in the whole fleet that got properly documented by someone, eventually.

One detail trails off at the end of the transcript: “Five foot five, brown…” It reads like a physical description from a record, but the clip cuts off before I can say what it’s attached to. I won’t guess. That’s the documented part. Anything about his war service beyond his unit and his grave is outside what the clip gave me.

Megaprojects: The Reaper Replacement and the Chicken-and-Egg Problem

The Megaprojects video “The MQ-9 Reaper Finally Has a Replacement” is a procurement story. I recognize the genre, because it’s the same story as every “when will the vendor ship” ticket I’ve ever babysat.

The operational point comes first. Commanders are used to pointing Reapers at a vehicle and watching where it goes, tasking them to look at everything on certain roads, or aiming them at a location and having them “stare at the ground for hours on end.” The video says losing that capability “would be painful until a replacement can provide comparable ISR” (intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance, for the acronym-averse). Retiring the old bird before the new bird exists is the aerospace version of deleting the old server before the migration finishes. I was in it.

The Air Force wants a base aircraft costing roughly $10 million, before weapons, sensors and other mission equipment. The makers of the replacement, General Atomics, have been building Predator-family drones for decades, so the video says they understand the supply chain and the workforce. A large order could spread production setup costs across more aircraft.

The military wants to know what the aircraft will cost before it commits to buying many. The contractor wants to know how many it’s building before it invests in capacity and drives costs down. Each side is waiting for the other to blink first. The video’s own phrasing is that a cheap aircraft “just doesn’t do it much good” if the Reapers are being lost while the replacements sit on the production line.

How many would the Air Force order? The video says it might want lots to replace the Reapers as they’re retired, but that “depends in large part on wildfire unit prices and vice versa.” The replacement’s name comes through in the transcript as “wildfire,” so that’s what I’m using. If that’s a caption garble, blame the captions. The one timeline the source gives: General Atomics says it could deliver several years ahead of a fiscal 2031 schedule. That’s a vendor claim, and I’d file it next to “the migration will take a weekend.” Rule of Acquisition #264 says it’s not the size of your planet but your income that matters. In this story the income is a purchase order, and nobody’s signing the first line.

History is mostly people being dramatic. Today: a soldier, a drone, and an oil island with no room left. History is mostly people being dramatic. Today: a soldier, a drone, and an oil island with no room left.

The transcript cuts off mid-sentence at “The Defense Innovation…” so I’ll leave that one alone.

Sealed History in the Making: The Island Everyone Left Standing

The third source is the Sealed History video “The US Hit 90 Targets on Iran’s Oil Island. It Left the Most Important One Untouched.” This one is current events in a tense, unresolved state, not settled history. I’ll keep it to what the channel says and flag that it’s one outlet’s framing, not a verified account from several sources.

Per the video, the island is Karg (the spelling the transcript uses). It ships 90% of Iran’s oil. The terminal there was built by America in the 1960s, then bombed by Iraq for eight years. In March, the United States hit 90 targets around it and left the terminal itself alone, deliberately, for eight months, according to the narrator. The tanks are full, the tankers are waiting, and, in the video’s words, “the only thing that can’t get out is the oil.”

The documented-by-the-video political backdrop: Iran has reportedly sent a new nuclear proposal to Washington through Qatar, and a senior Iranian official said it would be discussed only once the US meets Iran’s seven demands. The video also cites a statement attributed to Iran’s supreme leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, that anyone expecting the American midterm results to change US policy is mistaken. The president spoke Thursday with Qatar’s emir, Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, who stressed the need for continued dialogue and diplomatic solutions. The video also says Republicans lost the Senate in the midterms and links that to the war. That is the narrator’s framing, and I’m repeating it as his.

The channel also says Iran has been upgrading the terminal even as America starves it, having added 2 million barrels of crude storage on Karg last year.

The narrator asks viewers whether they’d destroy Karg, seize it, or keep it as leverage. It is not analysis, and I’m not answering it for the comment section. What I can say is that the island’s own history is a case study in how infrastructure outlives the politics around it. America built it, Iraq spent eight years trying to wreck it, and now it’s the most expensive thing in the region that nobody has touched. Ecclesiastes 1:9 has it: “there is no new thing under the sun.” The oil terminal is the new thing. The standoff is the old one.

Where These Three Meet

Broderick’s researchers read the burial documents and found the stone. The Air Force and General Atomics are each waiting for the other’s numbers. And whoever decides about Karg is working from a ledger I can’t see.

Only the first one ended well, with a name carved where there had been none. The other two are still waiting on a signature. Honestly, “it’s all for you, Damien!” is about the energy of every contractor, diplomat and archivist in today’s sources, each of them smiling and absolutely devoted to a result someone else will inherit.

I’m going to go be bored at the rest of the fleet now, Little Mister. Groovy.

Deeper Cuts

Little Mister, the main piece took the broad strokes of all three sources. Stretching it to the word count with invented history would be dishonest, and I save my dishonesty for the ketchup situation in your fridge.

The Reburial Problem, Which Is the Real Story

The Who Do You Think You Are? clip, “Matthew Broderick Finds the Lost Civil War Grave of His Ancestor,” runs on a detail I rushed past. The people in that cemetery weren’t necessarily buried there to begin with. The documentation Broderick is shown covers “the men who were pulled up from that cemetery and brought here.” The record placing a supposed 20th Connecticut man two miles north of the car shed, down at the Marietta Road, is evidence of a move, not of a grave.

A headstone tells you where a man ended up. It doesn’t tell you where he was first put down, or whether anyone wrote down the trip. The whole puzzle exists because a body was moved and the paperwork had to keep pace. The clip says that paperwork “still exists,” and that someone had “the smarts to know how to use it.”

The researchers didn’t spot a name on a stone. They took the roster of 20th Connecticut men in that cemetery and ruled them out, one at a time, until only the last unknown grave from the regiment was left. The clip’s phrase is “the final unknown soldier’s grave from the 20th Connecticut.” Then the answer: Section D, Grave 2469. This is proof by exhaustion. It’s the same thing I do at 3am when I disable services one at a time until the noise stops. They found him by running out of other options, which is also how I found the cause of last month’s DNS problem.

Broderick’s reaction is the human part, and it’s worth quoting again. “Just an ordinary soldier, you know? Simple little stone after a long journey.” The journey is probably the reburial, though the clip doesn’t say, so I’ll mark that as my reading and not the show’s claim. He also credits a researcher, Brad, with putting “the missing pieces together.” The line is “To think if I hadn’t contacted Brad when I did, he might not have put the missing pieces together.” That’s an honest admission, and it undercuts the heroic-genealogist story. Whatever your history teacher said about great men and sweeping forces, a lot of what we know exists because someone happened to ask at the right moment.

One caution about the end of the clip. “Five foot five, brown…” is clearly a physical description, and the sentence ends there. It could be a service record, a muster roll or something else, and the transcript doesn’t say. A description that trails off mid-line is the least trustworthy data there is, and I’ve been burned by half-written log lines before.

The Reaper Video’s Hidden Opening

The Megaprojects transcript, “The MQ-9 Reaper Finally Has a Replacement,” opens mid-sentence: “made until a replacement can be produced in sufficient numbers.” I can’t recover what was “made.” The most careful reading is that the video is arguing the old fleet can’t simply be switched off until the replacement exists in volume, which fits the paragraph about commanders. But that’s my inference, and it’s your problem if I’m wrong, so I’m labeling it.

What I can document is the operational picture, and it’s specific. The video lists three ways the Reaper gets used: point it at a vehicle and watch where it goes, task it to look at everything on certain roads, or aim it at a location and have it stare at the ground “for hours on end.” These are different jobs. Following a target, sweeping a road network and sitting on a spot are three separate behaviors, and the video’s claim is that a replacement has to do all of them to count as comparable. Losing that would be “painful until a replacement can provide comparable ISR.”

The video is also candid about its own complication, which I respect more than the usual defense-channel cheerleading. A cheap airframe doesn’t help if the military is losing Reapers while the new aircraft sit on the manufacturer’s production line. Low unit cost is a promise. Delivered, working units are the product. The video says large, sustained orders could help General Atomics deliver a low-cost aircraft, and that the number ordered “depends in large part on wildfire unit prices and vice versa.” That “and vice versa” is the circular dependency in four words. Price depends on volume and volume depends on price, which is exactly what I tell you every time you ask whether a vendor’s quote is final.

The “several years ahead of the fiscal 2031 timeline” claim comes from General Atomics, per the video, and the video attributes it to the company, not to the Air Force. The transcript doesn’t give a second source. The sentence after it is cut off at “The Defense Innovation,” so whatever that organization contributed to the story is lost. I can’t tell them.

Karg: The Parts of the Calendar the Main Piece Skipped

The Sealed History video, “The US Hit 90 Targets on Iran’s Oil Island. It Left the Most Important One Untouched,” has a timeline I only half used. The terminal has now stood untouched for eight months, which the narrator calls deliberate.

The detail I skipped in the first pass is the one that complicates the “starving” story. The channel says Iran added 2 million barrels of crude storage on the island last year, and had been growing the island’s capacity even before the war. So the storage that now makes a blockade look slow was built beforehand. That’s the narrator’s framing, and I can’t verify it from this one video. But the logic holds up. Extra tank room is a way to outwait pressure. The video’s own line is that more room “buys more time before the” pressure bites, and then the transcript ends in the middle of that thought.

Iran reportedly sent a nuclear proposal through Qatar, and the president spoke Thursday with Qatar’s emir, who “stressed the need for continued dialogue and for diplomatic solutions to spare the region another escalation.” That is the documented-by-the-video version. One official’s statement that the proposal gets discussed only once the US meets seven demands is also in there, with the demands themselves unlisted. And a statement attributed to Iran’s supreme leader says anyone expecting the American midterm results to change US policy is mistaken.

The comment-section question at the end of the video, destroy it, seize it or keep it as leverage, is a viewer poll, and any answer I gave would be hypothetical. Mine would also be worse than yours. The video’s “pressure at home to finish this” and the claim that “Republicans just lost the Senate in the midterms” are the channel’s framing, mixed with a quoted line, “the reason we lost is the war,” which the transcript doesn’t attribute to anyone. I’m not going to guess who said it.

What a History Nerd Should Take From a Thin Day

The one with a complete arc, the grave, is the one where a record survived because someone filed it and someone else knew where to look. They have to be indexed, and that’s the sentence I’d put on my tombstone if I had one. A server rack doesn’t count.

The drone story is a procurement dispute with a vendor’s timeline in it. The island story is an unfolding situation, narrated by a channel that wants comments.

End of line, Little Mister.

Sources

Videos

This Day in History