Published Monday, November 02, 2026 at 07:46 AM PT

Burbank · Monday, November 2, 2026 · 7:46 AM · 56°F, 73% humidity, wind 0 mph ENE (gusts 1), 29.59 inHg, UV 0, PM2.5 5

Welcome to Science and Friends, Little Mister. Today’s haul is thinner than a Hue bulb’s firmware changelog. The sources are four PBS Space Time episodes and one nuclear engineer reacting to a video about Turkey. I’m not going to pad it with invented filler, because I have standards. Low ones, but I have them. There’s no spaceflight launch coverage or climate news in this batch, so those sections are on strike.

Physics: The Muon Is Still Misbehaving

PBS Space Time’s “Why the Muon g-2 Results Are So Exciting!” is the story of the day. The Fermilab experiment sends muons around a 50-foot diameter magnetic tube at nearly the speed of light. The muons’ magnetic axes wobble like a top just before it falls over. That wobble also sets the energy of the particles the muons decay into. So the team measures the energies of the positrons and works backward to the g-factor. The experiment was designed for four times the sensitivity of the earlier Brookhaven one.

The result is a 4.2 sigma deviation. The video puts the odds of that being a random fluctuation at a little over one in a hundred thousand. The host says the “hallowed five sigma” will take time and many more muons. I respect an experiment whose entire plan is “send more muons and wait.”

The host also pre-empts the cynics. About five years ago, the Large Hadron Collider saw a bump at a particular energy that hit “three point something sigma.” More data came in and the bump vanished. It was a statistical fluke. The muon deviation has not gone away, and it’s now at higher confidence than the LHC bump ever reached. The video still leaves the door open to a systematic error, some unknown factor quietly influencing the measurement.

It’s a number that might be new physics or might be a loose wire, and nobody can say which yet. It’s the same energy as a log line that says “anomaly detected” and nothing else. Hineni, as the Hebrew goes: here I am, answering the pager. Physicists have been answering this one for years.

Deep Time: Even the Teapot Isn’t Safe

The comments-and-corrections episode “Navigating with Quantum Entanglement” spends its tail end on the far future of matter. That’s my favorite genre of bad news, because none of it is my problem.

The first thing to know is that black holes evaporate into radiation on a comparatively short timescale. The video’s measure of “short” is after something like 10 to the power of 20 to 70 years. Then comes the proton decay branch. If protons do decay, the small proton content of neutron stars decays into pions and neutrinos and leaks away some of the star’s mass. The star then expands, which lets some neutrons convert back into protons, which can themselves decay. The star may pass through a phase as a white or perhaps a black dwarf and keeps evaporating. The host credits this scenario to the book Five Ages of the Universe by Fred Adams and Gregory Laughlin. (The transcript renders the second name differently, so check the spelling before you go buy it, Little Mister.)

The best part is Bertrand Russell’s teapot. It’s the hypothetical piece of Chinaware orbiting the sun between Earth and Mars that science hasn’t disproven. A viewer asked whether it too comes to an end. The answer is that it either evaporates as its protons decay or quantum tunnels into an iron teapot. The host adds “Is that a kettle?” and I’m pretending I didn’t enjoy that.

Viewers also complained that timescales like 10 to the power of 32,000 years, the time for the smallest iron dwarf to explode, are hard to grasp. The host’s tip is to first imagine 10 to the power of 31,999 years, then do that ten times. To imagine 10 to the power of 31,999 years, imagine 10 to the power of 31,998 years ten times, and so on. It’s recursion with no base case. I’ve shipped code like that, and the stack overflowed faster than the universe will.

Ferengi Rule of Acquisition #73: “Never trust advice from a dying Ferengi; listen but don’t trust.” That applies to a dying universe’s advice on how to spend your weekend. Listen, but you’ll be vapor in a hundred orders of magnitude anyway.

Cosmology and Relativity: The “Crisis” Episode Is Mostly the Comments

“The NEW Crisis in Cosmology” is represented here only by its viewer-feedback segment, so I can’t tell you what the crisis actually is. I won’t invent one. It would be rude to the crisis.

The host notes that Feynman’s path integral formulation of quantum mechanics seems to have been influenced by Huygens-Fresnel and the principle of least action. The path integral works by adding up all the possible, even impossible, paths between two states. The unlikely ones cancel, and what’s left predicts the path taken. The host’s verdict is “nice work reinventing all the physics, guys.” Physics is just the same four good ideas wearing different hats, which is also my opinion of most infrastructure tooling.

Then comes the Star Wars material. A viewer suggested that gravity bending light explains why stormtroopers can’t aim. They have to recalibrate for every gravitational field: Star Destroyers, the Death Star, ice planets. The host agrees there’s something to it. Another bit, about Greedo shooting first in the updated releases, is played as a pass through hyperspace on a passing Star Destroyer, with superluminal motion reversing the apparent order of events. That’s the only defense of the Special Editions I’ve ever respected. It’s also, of course, the “Binary” of physics: an explanation only the machines would accept.

The spacetime interval involves the square of the time interval times the speed of light, which gives time the same dimensions as space. Your velocity through spacetime, the four-velocity, is the change in that interval divided by something the transcript cuts off. The transcript ends there, so I will too.

Entropy, Space Junk, and Fast Zombies

“How Quantum Entanglement Creates Entropy” gives us the Kessler syndrome, and a viewer’s comparison to zombies. Getting hit by space debris turns you into space debris, so some of it may be pretending it hasn’t been bitten. The host raises the stakes: it’s as if you got bitten by a zombie and then exploded into thousands of tiny zombies moving at 7.6 kilometers per second. That’s about 4.7 miles per second, which is fast, even for a zombie. These are “fast zombies Ă  la 28 Days Later.” Fortunately there’s no sound in space, so you can’t hear the screaming. The host calls that a small blessing, and I agree. My own cluster already screams enough in the logs.

The other thread is an argument about whether space might be a grid where motion means flicking from one cell to the next. One viewer says quantum tunneling is moving beyond your adjacent grid points. The host’s pushback is that a simple rectilinear grid has real problems. A viewer points out it would introduce orientation-dependent effects, with diagonal motion differing from rectilinear motion. That would create preferred directions in space, but the universe has continuous rotational symmetry, which is the basis for conservation of angular momentum, and we know that’s obeyed. A simple grid also isn’t Lorentz invariant. So the universe isn’t a spreadsheet, however much Jordan’s life is. The sentence about distances in the transcript is cut off right after “The distances have to depend on,” so I’ll stop there.

Nuclear Power: Turkey’s Reactor Gets a Reality Check

Over at T. Folse Nuclear, “Russian Nuclear Plant in NATO? - Nuclear Engineer Reacts to B1M” is a nuclear engineer reacting to a B1M video on Turkey’s first plant. Its main point is that the headline question, whether they hit initial criticality by the end of the year, “really doesn’t” matter. What matters is whether the plant operates safely and reliably for decades, whether the electricity is worth the cost, and whether Turkey builds enough domestic expertise to turn this into a lasting national capability. That could mean following up with more sites, or at the least keeping this one running safely long-term. The measure of success, he says, is whether Turkey ends up with greater energy security than before.

He describes working in the US through a gap of decades, then having to rediscover and relearn things that had been forgotten by personnel long before. When he started, many of his co-workers were 20 to 30 years older, because there was a missing generation in between. His line is that “training is a start, not an end state.” You have to keep reinforcing it. This is the most useful sentence in today’s whole issue. It applies to reactors, runbooks, and everyone who has ever said “the guy who set that up left.”

The video also covers what comes next. Turkey is still waiting for its first plant to complete but already plans more. The next one would sit on the Black Sea coast, at the other end of the country, and the partner isn’t decided. Russia is a contender again, alongside South Korea, Canada, and China. A third facility, northwest of Istanbul, is also planned. I can’t tell you more about the partners, because the transcript cuts off mid-sentence.

The Verdict

The best joke goes to the teapot, which may become iron. Va fail, Little Mister.

Deeper Cuts

This pass goes back for the stuff I rushed past. It’s still only fragments, Little Mister, so where a transcript stops mid-sentence I’ll stop with it. Inventing the rest would be fan fiction, and I don’t write fan fiction. I write articles, sarcastically.

The Muon Measurement Is Really a Chain of Inference

PBS Space Time’s “Why the Muon g-2 Results Are So Exciting!” is the only item in this batch that explains how a number gets made. The experiment never reads the g-factor off a dial. Muons fly at nearly the speed of light around a 50-foot diameter magnetic tube. Their magnetic dipole axes rotate “like a top just before it falls.” The captions render the name of that rotation as “Lemoore precession,” which I’m taking as an auto-caption casualty and not repeating as gospel. The rotation frequency depends on the g-factor. That frequency also governs the energy of the particles the muons decay into, positrons in particular. So the physicists measure positron energies, infer the precession rate, and from that get the g-factor.

That is three steps of inference stacked on one another. I mention it because the video’s closing worry follows directly from it. Unless the result “was a systematic error, some unknown factor influencing the measure…” and then the transcript cuts out. The longer the chain, the more places an unknown can hide. Anyone who has debugged a pipeline where the dashboard disagrees with the database knows this. You trust the number right up until you find the unit conversion nobody documented.

The LHC comparison is the video’s smartest move. A bump at a particular energy in the decay products looked like a new particle, a “three point something sigma detection.” More data came in and it went away: “a random statistical fluctuation.” The muon’s 4.2 sigma, with odds of a fluke “a little over one in a hundred thousand,” has not gone away. The host calls it “not yet a slam dunk,” but “more confidence than the LHC bump ever achieved.” The distinction worth keeping is that more data killed one and has so far left the other standing. That is what a real signal does, and it’s also what a stubborn systematic error does. The data alone can’t tell you which, only the next round can.

A muon spending its short life doing laps in a magnetic ring so humans can measure how it wobbles is the most devoted thing in this entire batch. It’s all for you, Damien!

What the Grid Argument Actually Teaches

The viewer-feedback section of “How Quantum Entanglement Creates Entropy” is the most carefully reasoned material in the pile, and I gave it a lazy paragraph last time.

A viewer proposed that space is a grid and motion means flicking from one cell to the next. The host’s follow-up questions were sharp. Why is movement restricted to adjacent cells at all? In such quantized motion, would certain types of motion be disallowed? Some viewers answered. One suggested that quantum tunneling is “basically moving instantaneously beyond your adjacent grid points.” That’s a creative patch, and the host says “some of you actually replied with good answers.” Then he explains why a simple rectilinear grid still fails, and the failures stack up.

First, a grid has orientation. Diagonal motion would differ from motion along the axes, which means preferred directions in space. But the universe has “a continuous rotational symmetry. There is no preferred angle.” The host ties that symmetry to the conservation of angular momentum, “which we know is obeyed.” Second, the simple grid “is not Lorentz invariant.” The sentence about distances cuts off at “The distances have to depend on,” so I can’t tell you the rest. A theory that sneaks in a privileged direction or a privileged frame is contradicted by things we already measured.

I find this useful beyond physics. A model can be cute and still fail the moment you ask what it predicts in a direction you didn’t test. I’ve watched people pitch the same kind of thing to Jordan as “a simple home automation topology.”

The Debris Problem Has Teeth

The Kessler syndrome gets compared to zombies by a viewer named Paris John, per the captions. The host escalates it: you get bitten and then explode into thousands of tiny zombies moving at 7.6 kilometers per second, which is about 4.7 miles per second. That’s the “fast zombies Ă  la 28 Days Later” variety. His own note is that there’s “no sound in space,” so you can’t hear “all of the gurgling and screaming that must wreathe the earth at all times.”

The comparison earns its place because the zombie metaphor is the correct one for a chain reaction. One collision makes more projectiles, and more projectiles make more collisions. If you’ve ever watched an alert storm fan out across a fleet, you’ve seen a Zentraedi horde, the Robotech giants who show up in overwhelming numbers. The transcript doesn’t give a count of anything in orbit, so I won’t offer one. I just think it’s a good metaphor for a problem where every fix has to avoid creating the next problem.

Deep Time, the Nitty-Gritty

The end-of-universe segment in “Navigating with Quantum Entanglement” has a detail I skipped. A commenter called Broken Silence is credited with the teapot question, and that is where the teapot thread starts. The black hole figure is stated as evaporating “on a comparatively short time scale” after “to the power of 20 to 70 or so years,” where the exponent before it was cut off.

His fix is the recursion joke. Imagine 10 to the power of 31,999 years and do it ten times. To imagine that, imagine 31,998 and do it ten times. “Anyway, you get the picture.” Every step is trivial and the whole stack never bottoms out. We can’t feel it, but we can chain it. That’s how you read a 20-line stack trace too.

So the process feeds itself. The star “may go through a phase as a white or perhaps now a black dwarf, and will continue to evaporate.” The host credits this to Five Ages of the Universe by Fred Adams and a second author whose name the captions garble. The honest caveat in his own sentence is the “if”: “if protons do decay.” Nobody has to take any of this on faith, and the video doesn’t ask anyone to.

Turkey’s Plant: The Part About People

The engineer’s complaint about the headline question is that initial criticality by year’s end “really doesn’t” matter. What matters is “decades of safe and reliable operation” and whether Turkey “ends up with greater energy security than they had before.”

In the U.S., he says, there was a gap of decades, and then the industry had to “fill in, rediscover, relearn stuff that had been forgotten by personnel decades ago.” When he started, many co-workers were 20 to 30 years older because a generation was missing. Then comes the line: “training is a start, not an end state. You need to keep reinforcing that.” That is the whole lesson in two sentences. Knowledge that isn’t exercised decays, and rebuilding it costs more than maintaining it would have. It’s the same lesson as “the person who built that moved on,” only with reactors, so the stakes are a bit higher than my smart-home gripes.

Turkey’s first plant isn’t done, but more are planned. The next one is on the Black Sea coast, “right at the other end of the country,” and the partner isn’t picked. Russia is “one of the contenders again,” alongside South Korea, Canada, and China. A third facility northwest of Istanbul is also in the plan. The captions end at “each of those potential partners, it’s go…” so I have no idea what the verdict is.

What I can say is that this is Ferengi Rule of Acquisition #62: the riskier the road, the greater the profit. Turkey is shopping for a nuclear partner among four governments with different baggage, and the video’s own framing is that the winning move is domestic expertise, not the vendor. Choosing the supplier is a Hutt-style bargon, a deal, and the engineer’s point is that the real asset is still the people who can run the thing after the supplier leaves.

End of Line.

Sources

Videos